professor-curious-logo

What is the role of evidence in a research argument?

Evidence supports claims, strengthens the argument, and increases credibility.

Flip to see [answer/question]
Flip to see [answer/question]

All Flashcards

What is the role of evidence in a research argument?

Evidence supports claims, strengthens the argument, and increases credibility.

How can you strengthen your line of reasoning?

By logically connecting claims, evidence, and ideas in a clear and coherent manner.

Why is it important to acknowledge limitations in research?

Acknowledging limitations demonstrates critical thinking and provides a balanced view of the findings.

How do implications contribute to a research argument?

Implications highlight the significance of the research and its potential impact on the field.

What makes a research argument logical?

Claims, evidence, and conclusions flow logically from one another, creating a coherent and persuasive narrative.

What are the key components of a strong conclusion?

Logical alignment with evidence, discussion of limitations, and implications for the field.

How does a literature review strengthen an argument?

It provides context, demonstrates understanding, and roots the argument in a larger academic discussion.

Why is identifying a gap important for argumentation?

It ensures originality and demonstrates the value of the research.

How does topic focus affect the strength of an argument?

A narrow scope makes the argument more accurate and manageable, avoiding broad generalizations.

How do you justify a conclusion in research?

With a logical progression, evidence, limitations, and implications.

Define 'literature review'.

A literature review provides context and roots your argument in a larger academic discussion.

What is a research gap?

A gap in existing research that your work addresses, ensuring originality and value.

Define 'quantitative research'.

Research focused on numbers, counting, math, and percentages.

Define 'qualitative research'.

Research focused on data that can't be counted, like interviews and written responses.

What is 'replicability' in research?

The ability for another researcher to duplicate your experiment and verify the results.

What is 'plagiarism'?

Presenting someone else's work or ideas as your own, with or without their consent, by incorporating it into your work without full acknowledgement.

What is 'topic focus'?

Clear, narrow parameters addressed through your method and conclusion.

Define 'writing conventions'.

Enhance communication through organization, design, grammar, style, and precision.

What is a research 'method'?

Your approach to inquiry, detailing how you investigated your research question.

Define 'new understanding/conclusion'.

Justify your conclusion with a logical progression, evidence, limitations, and implications.

What are the essential components of a strong research conclusion?

Line of reasoning, evidence use, limitations, implications, and logical alignment.

Why is a clear line of reasoning important?

It connects your claims, evidence, and ideas, creating a coherent argument.

Why is it important to acknowledge limitations in research?

To show what your research can't discover and why, demonstrating critical thinking.

Why are implications important in a research conclusion?

They suggest what your work means for the field, highlighting its potential impact.

What is the role of evidence in supporting claims?

Evidence provides support for your claims, making your argument more persuasive and credible.

How does a narrow scope strengthen an argument?

It makes your argument more accurate and manageable, avoiding broad topics that lead to counter-arguments.

What is the effect of an argument rooted in a wider conversation?

Shows that you understand the topic you’re researching, bolstering your credibility as well as informing your research skills and process.

Why is it important to understand the context of the argument?

Good arguments understand the context they’re being made in.

Why is it important to explain the method taken to get to the conclusion?

Good arguments explain the method they took to get to their conclusion from their research question/inquiry question.

Why is it important for the argument to be methodical?

Good arguments are methodical and make sense all throughout.