Both were absolute monarchs who centralized power, but Louis focused on cultural dominance while Peter focused on military modernization.

Both involved centralized power and control of the nobility, but French absolutism was more focused on culture and religion, while Russian absolutism focused on military and westernization.

The Edict of Nantes granted religious tolerance, while the Edict of Fontainebleau revoked it, showing a shift from tolerance to religious suppression.

Richelieu focused on political centralization through the intendant system, while Colbert focused on economic centralization through mercantilist policies.

Peter focused on military and bureaucratic reforms, while Catherine emphasized education and territorial expansion.

Henry IV aimed for religious compromise with the Edict of Nantes, while Louis XIV sought religious uniformity by revoking it.

Versailles was used to control the nobility and project power, while St. Petersburg symbolized Russia's shift towards the West and modernization.

Colbert focused on mercantilism and protecting French industries, while Peter focused on developing industries and infrastructure to support military modernization.

Louis XIV faced challenges related to religious divisions and economic strain from wars, while Peter faced resistance to his westernization reforms from traditional elements of Russian society.

In both France and Russia, absolutist rulers sought to limit the power of the nobility, but the methods differed. Louis XIV used Versailles to control the French nobility, while Peter the Great forced the Russian boyars to adopt Western customs and serve in the military or government.

Cause: Henry IV wanted to unite France. Effect: Granted religious tolerance to Huguenots, bringing peace.

Cause: Richelieu wanted to reduce the nobility's influence. Effect: Royal officials enforced decrees and collected taxes, centralizing power.

Cause: Louis XIV wanted to control the nobility and show off his power. Effect: Nobility was controlled, but it strained the French economy.

Cause: Louis XIV wanted religious uniformity. Effect: Huguenots fled France, harming the economy.

Cause: Peter wanted to modernize Russia. Effect: Russia became a major European power, but social reforms were met with resistance.

Cause: Peter the Great wanted access to the Baltic Sea. Effect: Russia gained control of the Baltic Sea, increasing its power and trade.

Cause: Henry IV needed to raise money. Effect: Increased revenue but burdened peasants with higher taxes.

Cause: Peter wanted to modernize Russian society. Effect: Women gained more freedom, and boyars were forced to adopt Western customs, leading to social tensions.

Cause: Louis XIV wanted to strengthen the French economy. Effect: Improved infrastructure, protected French industries, and modernized the military, but led to increased taxation.

Cause: Political instability and succession crisis in Russia. Effect: Led to the election of Michael Romanov and the establishment of the Romanov dynasty.

The first Bourbon king of France who signed the Edict of Nantes.

Chief Minister under Louis XIII who centralized power in France through the intendant system.

King of France who relied on Cardinal Richelieu to consolidate power.

The Sun King of France, an epitome of absolutism, who built Versailles and revoked the Edict of Nantes.

Louis XIV's finance minister who helped centralize the state through economic reforms.

The first tsar of the Romanov dynasty, elected in 1613.

A Russian tsar who modernized and westernized Russia, building St. Petersburg.

Russian ruler who continued Peter's reforms, particularly in education and territorial expansion.

Chief Minister under Henry IV who helped reduce debt and revive the French economy.

Peter the Great modernized Russia, built St. Petersburg, and reformed the military and government.